Which institution is considered evil and dangerous by the Patriot movement?

The perception of the United Nations as an evil and dangerous institution by the Patriot movement stems from a combination of distrust in global governance and the belief that international organizations undermine national sovereignty. The United Nations is often viewed by adherents of the Patriot movement as a symbol of centralized, authoritative control that could infringe upon individual liberties and national rights. This perspective is intensified by concerns over perceived globalist agendas, which are thought to prioritize international mandates over the needs and desires of local populations.

Believers in this movement may argue that the UN's initiatives—such as treaties and regulations—could lead to loss of power for local governments and an erosion of American values. Consequently, the rhetoric surrounding the United Nations reflects fears of a one-world government and a belief that the organization could impose decisions contrary to the interests of the United States.

The other institutions mentioned, while also viewed critically in various contexts, do not carry the same extensive narrative of being a direct threat to American sovereignty within the specific framework of the Patriot movement. The focus on the United Nations highlights the movement's concerns over global governance and its perceived implications for individual rights and national autonomy.